купель ушат, бондарное производство, самооборона на улице, бочки для вина декоративные,

четвер, 29 травня 2014 р.

http://ift.tt/1jWYklM

Yesterday, Apple and Beats Electronics announced that their union is official: Apple will acquire the headphone and streaming-music company for about $3 billion. As the news made headlines, one national brand wanted to nudge its way into the “trending topics” spotlight, and achieved the best current events/brand promotion tweet that we have ever seen.


hugesalad


Denny’s, please step up and accept your crown. Which is made of beets, probably. The previous greatest current events/brand promotion tweet that we know of was when Arby’s saw a familiar-looking hat during the Grammy awards and turned Pharrell’s strange headgear choice into a flood of good publicity and a charitable donation.


We’re more likely to post about social media gaffes, which usually result when well-meaning people try to take advantage of trending topics or hot news stories. Sometimes we think that brands should just forget about making timely and amusing updates altogether. (Sometimes ignoring the news can get you in trouble, too.) This is an example of brand tweeting done well.


What does $3 billion worth of beets look like, anyway? From my misspent public television-watching childhood, here’s a start:





morez срочный автовыкуп by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

http://ift.tt/1jWYklM

278997357_a4c17855fb_zWhen you order clothes online, do you order two different sizes, figuring that one will fit you and you can take the other back? Joke’s on you, over-ordering person! That consumer behavior is one of the reasons why women’s clothing manufacturers are switching clothes from numbered sizes to small, medium, and large.


Need to fit people outside of that size range? No problem; just slap on an X and sell extra-small. Switching to what people in the biz call “alpha sizing” saves manufacturers money and resources, making it easier to stock clothes when they arrive and to sell out of a given size once they hit the racks. The Wall Street Journal reports that some clothing companies are making this switch with some or all of their items.


Why is that? Each size in an alpha sizing system replaces two numbered sizes. Think of a typical size run of one item that you might see on a rack at a mall clothing store: you would find sizes 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16. Nine different sizes. Alpha sizing cuts that same size range down to five sizes: XS, S, M, L, and XL. (The Wall Street Journal ignored plus-sized clothing for the purposes of this story, maybe because most plus-sized clothes are already sold in a numeric extension of the alpha size scale: 1X, 2X, 3X and so on.) Stocking fewer sizes makes manufacturing the clothes and running a retail store easier.


It’s not easier on the end user, of course. Even a simplified sizing system isn’t consistent from one manufacturer to another, because that would be too easy. Alpha sizing does give consumers an additional nightmare: clothing specifically designed to fit a wider range of people. Wrap dresses, elastic and drawstring waists, stretchy blazers, and baggy tops are all designed to accommodate a wider range of people than one numeric size.


If you’ve been thinking about learning how to tailor your own ready-to-wear clothes, now may be the time to do it.


Shopping for Clothes? Forget a Size 4, You’ll Have to Try a Small [Wall Street Journal]




morez срочный автовыкуп by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

http://ift.tt/1jWYklM


When we saw that Ford announced a recall of 1.39 million cars and sport-utility vehicles, we had to check back in the archives. Hadn’t we just posted about a Ford recall? Yes, it was only earlier this month that 692,000 vehicles were recalled because their airbags might not deploy. This latest batch mainly involves power steering failure in SUVs.

Ford reports that that they know of fifteen crashes that may be the result of loss of power steering in Explorer SUVs. According to the company, no one sustained serious injuries in any of these crashes, which all occurred at low speeds.


Here are the Ford vehicles recalled:


Ford Explorer, model years 2011 to 2013 – 195,527 vehicles recalled for power steering issues


Ford Escape and Mercury Mariner, model years 2008 to 2011 – 915,216 vehicles recalled for power steering issues


Taurus, model years 2010 to 2014 – about 200,000 vehicles recalled for a mysterious “corrosion issue”


Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan and Lincoln Zephyr and MKZ, model years 2006 to 2011 – 82,576 vehicles recalled for floor mats that may interfere with the accelerator


If you’re the original owner and your information is on file with Ford, you should receive a notification about the recall: if not, and if your car is one of the model years listed, give your friendly local Ford dealer a call.


Ford recalls 1.39 million vehicles in North America [Reuters]




morez срочный автовыкуп by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

http://ift.tt/1jWYklM


Government regulators create laws and initiate investigations in order to protect consumers from an array of hurtful products and companies. One such consumer fraud investigation by the Justice Department is “Operation Choke Point” and it’s resulted in criminal and civil probes by U.S. prosecutors. But some legislators see the investigation as more hurtful than helpful.

According to a report by Reuters, U.S. prosecutors have opened criminal and civil probes into at least 15 banks and payment processors as part of “Operation Choke Point” over the last year.


The investigation aims to crack down on fraud by going after firms that handle and move money with suspect businesses.


As of November 2013, the House of Representatives’ Oversight Committee reported that criminal probes had been opened regarding four payment processors, one bank and several officials. Additionally, civil fraud law investigations were opened against at least 10 banks and payment processors.


An official with the Justice Dept. wrote in a memo to the Oversight Committee that the investigation had already cause some banks to stop processing payments for firms believed to be involved in fraud against consumers.


But that has some congressional members unhappy saying the Justice Dept. conducted a shadowy effort to put firms with legal activities out of business by pressuring banks to stop working with them, Reuters reports.


“Operation Choke Point is the Justice Department’s newest abuse of power,” Rep. Darrell Issa, Oversight panel leader said in a news release. “If the administration believes some businesses should be out of business, they should prosecute them before a judge and jury.”


A spokesperson for the Justice Dept. tell Reuters maintains that the department only investigates firms that break federal laws.


“When financial institutions choose to process transactions, even though they know the transactions are fraudulent or are willfully ignorant of that fact, they are breaking federal law and we will not hesitate to hold them accountable.”


U.S. probing 15 banks, payment processors for fraud [Reuters]




morez срочный автовыкуп by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

http://ift.tt/1jWYklM


Strap on your jetpacks and shine up your moon boots, because we’re going to space, y’all. Maybe not this minute or even this year, but if you can dream it, you can achieve it. At least if you’re super rich Sir Richard Branson and the U.S. government just told you you can start planning space flights.

Branson’s Virgin Galactic has been revvings its engines to take to the stars (or at least the Earth’s orbit) and now it’s got official clearance to start mapping those flights out, reports CNNMoney.


The company has said in the past that it’d like to send the first commercial flights up by the end of this year, with Branson and his family traveling on the initial voyage on SpaceShipTwo.


Flights will take off from New Mexico’s Spaceport, which was built solely for the purpose of sending off commercial space flights.


The Federal Aviation Administration is also on board, as it were, and will figure out particulars with local air traffic control to make sure those flights aren’t interfering with any others in the airspace.


It’ll be a bustling business for Virgin, as the company says it’s already received more than $70 million in deposits for spots from around 580 people.




morez срочный автовыкуп by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

http://ift.tt/1jWYklM


While a U.S. Supreme Court decision yesterday in the case of a Michigan Native American tribe’s allegedly illegal casino appears to have nothing to do with payday lending, experts say it’s a game changer in states’ efforts to rein in the often predatory industry.

The National Consumer Law Center reports that the court decision [PDF] has serious repercussions for illegal online payday lenders who claim to have affiliation with Native American tribes in order to avoid repercussions.


While Wednesday’s court decision in the case of Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community affirmed that the state could not sue an American Indian tribe for operating an off-reservation casino, it also made clear that the state has other, equally powerful, options when a tribe conducts activity off-reservation.


“The game is up for payday lenders who attempt to cloak illegal conduct in tribal immunity,” National Consumer Law Center Associate Director Lauren Saunders, says in a news release [PDF]. “The Supreme Court’s decision makes clear that purportedly tribal payday lenders who loan off-reservation must comply with state laws, including interest rate caps and state licensing laws, and that courts can enter an injunction stopping illegal lending—even by tribal entities.”


The Supreme Court emphasized that when a tribe conducts off-reservation activities they are subject to any generally applicable state law. Meaning the state can deny a license and if a tribe goes ahead with the unlicensed activity the state could bring suit against tribal officials and employees seeking an injunction or pursue criminal charges.


Officials with NCLC say the decision makes a clear statement that states can “shutter, quickly and permanently, an illegal casino” and that the same is true for illegal payday loans that claim tribal affiliation.


Payday lending businesses that align themselves with American Indian tribes have come under greater scrutiny by federal regulators in recent years.


In March, a U.S. District Court judge upheld a magistrate judge’s 2013 ruling that the Federal Trade Commission has authority to regulate certain companies associated with Indian tribes.


That ruling revolved around Colorado-based AMG Services’ claim that it was exempt from FTC enforcement because of its affiliation with American Indian tribes.


Last November, New York State sent cease and desist orders to dozens of online payday lenders to make them stop pursuing residents through advertisements in the state.


In August 2013, Western Sky Financial, a payday lender operating out of a tribal reservation in South Dakota, announced it would discontinue offering loans after facing lawsuits from around the country over three-digit interest rates for its loans. The company had perviously claimed they were not bound by state law because of their tribal affiliation.


These lenders are just a few of the payday operations that claim they are not bound by state law because they operate on tribal reservations.


Wednesday’s Supreme Court decision gives new life for a push by states to rein in the payday lending industry.


“Tribal sovereignty is an important principle that respects the dignity of nations mistreated throughout American history,” Andrew Pizor, staff attorney at the NCLC, says. “Fortunately, the Supreme Court decision affirms that states need not tolerate payday lenders attempting to use tribal sovereignty as a shield for illegal conduct.”


Supreme Court Decision Strikes Blow against Tribal Online Payday Lenders [National Consumer Law Center]




morez срочный автовыкуп by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

http://ift.tt/1jWYklM


Netflix CEO Reed Hastings delivered some pointed thoughts about Comcast’s play for national broadband dominance and the world of net neutrality while speaking at a conference in California this morning.


Hastings spoke in no uncertain terms before the audience at Code Conference today, making clear his issues with the ever-growing scope of Comcast.


He called residential internet a “natural monopoly,” which in most places it is, and drew attention to the fact that for most consumers, the only non-cable option is fiber — and even that’s limited. Cable, Hastings said, is pretty much the entire residential internet.


That turned the conversation to the recent peering deal Comcast and Netflix made earlier this year. Comcast continues to claim that Netflix is thirty percent of their internet traffic, and so should pay its fair share. Hastings quipped, “We offered to pay 30 percent of the costs if we get 30 percent of the revenue.” Comcast was not particularly interested in that arrangement.


Though the details of the arrangement between Comcast and Netflix remain confidential, Hastings expressed his displeasure with the fact that it needed to exist at all. The principle of the thing, he said, is the problem. “They want the whole internet to pay them for when their subscribers” do anything online. It starts with a small charge now, but over time, Comcast will want more and more. “Not just us, but to the whole internet,” Hastings said.


Comcast’s double-dipping money-making doesn’t just face the consumers, after all. It can hit businesses, too. And of course, it’s not just Comcast. Now, Netflix has to cut similar deals with everyone else, too.


Hastings pivoted from there to say that’s why Netflix endorses net neutrality: “If you have a monopoly structure, you need some protections,” he said. “That’s why we’ve been talking about creating an Internet with no slow lane.”


“When you listen to the radio more, it doesn’t cost you more,” explained Hastings. “But with gasoline, you pay more. The Internet is much closer to radio than to gas. There’s only a marginal increase in costs.”


Hastings has been on the record before saying that the Comcast/TWC merger is a terrible idea. When asked why he and his company have been such staunch and solo voices against the Comcast merger and for net neutrality, Hastings readily admitted that it was in the company’s best interests to do so. But, he added, someone has to:


“Someone has to stand up for what’s important. We’re raising the question –- [Comcast will] have 40 percent of residential Internet – what does it mean when one company has that kind of control?”


Data caps, higher prices, and even tighter control, that’s what. Netflix doesn’t see Comcast as the competition; that place is reserved for content companies like HBO. But it does need to get to viewers to succeed. And for that, it needs Comcast.


For more, not only about Comcast and net neutrality, but also about upcoming Netflix shows and why its DVD-only spinoff failed, check out the full liveblog at Re/Code.


Netflix CEO Reed Hastings Talks Net Neutrality [Re/Code]




morez срочный автовыкуп by Kate Cox via Consumerist